Tag: Radio Audience

Alternative names: radio audiences, radios audience

Previous
Next
29 occurrences Feed
Type Occurrence Published

Just maybe we need to take a look at what is being LOST.A sense of sharing,oneness,togetherness,being part of something that is MORE than just ourselves,knowing that there are others who hold your...

01 February 2008 18:16

*(Borrowed from Radio Today)* Almost 600,000 more people across the UK are listening to the radio today than three months ago, the latest RAJAR figures reveal.

16 August 2007 09:18

Yes, conflicting information indeed. All the evidence that i see on the ground is saying that radio listening is declining but older people seem to still be keen on it.

17 May 2010 11:35

:: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this :: right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to :: seek, receive and impart information and ideas...

18 August 2007 07:23

Jay BS wrote: : : Yes young artists in the North West and more so Liverpool have that : Passion about their City, area and radio

18 August 2007 05:32

: : Yes young artists in the North West and more so Liverpool have that : Passion about their City, area and radio

18 August 2007 05:19

Is that because Radio 1 steers away from the manufactured bands and Simon Cowell stuff in favour of the raw talent that dominates the evening output?— * Christopher England just said that *

17 August 2007 18:00

Bit hard to comment on your artists, as I don’t know who they are. And with respect to you, in particular, there could be a level of passion clouding views.

17 August 2007 17:54

Bit hard to comment on your artists, as I don’t know who they are. And with respect to you, in particular, there could be a level of passion clouding views.

17 August 2007 11:46

Bit hard to comment on your artists, as I don’t know who they are. And with respect to you, in particular, there could be a level of passion clouding views.

17 August 2007 11:43

Quoting a previous Jay BS contribution:- Is that because Radio 1 steers away from the manufactured bands and Simon Cowell stuff in favour of the raw talent that dominates the evening output?

17 August 2007 10:59

Quoting a previous txeng1 contribution:- I don't see why it doesn't. I mean, how stupid do they have to be to not see that in it's simplest form, copying something that works will, er, work?

17 August 2007 10:55

Radio 1 is doing a pretty good job. It bears absolutely no relation to the radio one of the 60s and 70s. Chris England is perfectly correct in his analysis of the station.

17 August 2007 10:19

Radio 1 is doing a pretty good job. It bears absolutely no relation to the radio one of the 60s and 70s. Chris England is perfectly correct in his analysis of the station.

16 August 2007 17:14

Steady Girls If the new improved RAJAR were to take your lead it would show R1 being listened to by old geezers :-) Now that would never do!!!!

16 August 2007 17:10

In article <5e8613025541f20d4418bf31b922820c@com-wc.kinomi.com>, (Address removed) (Richard Sharpe) wrote: Steady Girls

16 August 2007 12:38

Christopher England <(Address removed)> said:

16 August 2007 12:23

Quoting a previous Richard Sharpe contribution:- Thanks for doing that, Richard, and for your review! That means I owe you a morning of me listening to something I wouldn't normally listen to.

16 August 2007 11:57

I listened to Moyles this morning because i promised Chris i would, Luckily they didn't play to much of the music which wasn't to my taste,

16 August 2007 11:45

Easy. The radio audience is almost entirely composed of elderly easily-offended duffers, whereas the TV audience is almost entirely composed of the young and/​or brainless.

06 January 2007 00:23

In article <26707c62e8bc0d5fd66d8fc0ef2d366d@jiglu-wc>, (Address removed) (Jay BS) wrote:

14 February 2008 12:36

Southampton based Radio Hampshire has gone off air permanently – to the surprise of both staff and listeners.

31 May 2009 17:04

In article <48bf356a1e24fff55db2616390494050@com-wc.kinomi.com>, (Address removed) (smellofdiesel Tim) wrote:

28 November 2006 14:30

In article <2b1464111001a4d80fafe4721a45f810@jiglu-wc>, (Address removed) (txeng1) wrote:

30 September 2008 18:57

In article <00e901c86fc3$13ccbdb0$6f99d152@malmoe>, (Address removed) (Roy) wrote:

15 February 2008 12:13

From: "Christopher England" <(Address removed)> Glad to hear everybody is getting better.

22 January 2011 15:01

In article <f4cd38bd198a128e9a73fb88d6330b9a@jiglu-wc>, (Address removed) (Jay BS) wrote: Hi John if

18 July 2009 10:07

The olympics shouldn't be funded by public money at all quite frankly it is a disgusting waste of £9 billion plus which could be better spent on underfunded public services.

26 August 2008 12:35

Blinkin' R4 Types - oh no sorry, nice R4 types in tune with modern tech - Good On Ya R4 Types.

12 December 2011 11:58