Geoff Rogers <(Address removed)> said:
Have to say that I sadly agree here. While the romance of an offshore
station would appeal to many who contribute to this site, including
those who feel it would make no difference, I can't see how it would
upset or even concern governments. And I doubt whether it'd have more
than a few hundred listeners – and the station would stand for ....
what exactly?
I agree entirely that AM radio is well past its sell by date and will not get a large audience like it used to. However, in the case of offshore radio i think that the fact that as far as a government is concerned , the platform is not important and any attempt to broadcast freely over a wide area would be seen as a threat. Taking a photograph of a policeman in parliament square is hardly threatening but if you're spotted doing so , you will be questioned and asked to stop doing it and possibly arrested. The point is that the government are complete control freaks these days.
From the feeds
- Nigel Slater's memoir to be adapted for BBC1 by Billy Elliot writer - from Media Guardian (Respond)
- Russia to expand radio broadcasting to India – Putin - from Media Network Weblog (Respond)
- DW interactive radio project starts in Afghanistan - from Media Network Weblog (Respond)
- BBC logs 'just under 8,000' complaints about plan to close 6 Music - from Media Guardian (Respond)
- Russia to expand radio broadcasting to India – Putin (Respond)
















