Paul Kendall said:
Given Sterling's legal caveats, you'd have to be darn sure of the accuracy of your info, and I suspect would have to have a good reason for disclosing the info you claim to have.
You are completely correct, I'm sure others and myself have much documented evidence of past/outstanding cases, but as was suggested with Anoraks not knowing all the facts, to commence legal action very strict firm evidence is required. That is why there has to be access for legal purposes of anyone who uses bullying tactics and carries out libel tactics, thinking they have complete anonymity for life, hiding behind many aliases or different ISP addresses.
Of course we all want freedom but it must not be used as a cover to allow anyone that same freedom to abuse others as either a bully or by libel. These people must be brought to the courts, whatever and however long it takes.
From our sources
- Good to meet you … Emma Richards
- The search for the infamous Atari E.T. game cartridges landfill heats up
- Saving BBC3 'would have meant cutting funds for dramas such as Sherlock' - from The Guardian
- Saving BBC3 'would have meant cutting funds for dramas such as Sherlock'
- Eric Schmidt to dictators: 'You don’t turn off the internet: you infiltrate it'
- City links: the best of the web