Sunday, 11 May 2008



Steve Martin wrote:
: From: "Christopher England" <...>
:
: : In fact, this is part of a disturbing trend. I was looking at
: : Merseyland Alternative Radio's site only t'other day to discover to
: : my shock that the gentlemen involved were all rampant oiled-up
: : homosexuals.
:
: Hey! Watch out BIG BOY!

Oohh, talk dirty to me, Steve. be my bitch you hunk you…..

Seriously; that England bloke was only implying I'm a nutter, which is worse than gheylames. And of course he's merely researching for his quest to replace Pete Price? Methinks the lady doce prostesteth too much?

I'll have you know young Christopher that I'm totally barking insane. After all, one has to be to run a LBP station in these draconian days.

Well exactly chris, just take a look of major reference books in the world, The Bible is and was the most influential. Off course most of the stories have a bit of truth in them, but they've been changed to suit the people in power at the time of writing, mainly the Christian Church. No doubt many other religious books have had the same alterations made to suit wheoever. I think it's of prime importance to get balanced information, by that i suppose two completely different versions of the same event, if thats possible. With the freedom of the Internet, which will no doubt be "controlled" or "censored" before too long, you can get varying accounts and info about anything. Just because a teacher tells you it's right doesn't mean it is, nor is a bloke in a pulpit or a place of worship, right in every thing he says neither. The older you get the more you have the luxury of hindsight, politics and power are just the same, being "economical with the truth" is just telling porkies. Spin doctors for all the major parties do the same, i think it goes back to that saying "don't believe the hype" or better still "never mind the bollicks".

Geoff, great post.
I've read the Bible, The Quran, and many other religious books.
Perhaps I'm wrong but I never spotted any "Kill the unbeliever" text in any of them.

Sadly books are always open to interpretation and unfortunately some seem to choose to read them as an excuse to fight "holy" wars.

Wake up humankind, stop it. they are merely books FFS!!!

I'm not disrespecting anyone's faith here, just sayin' If a deity exists it should be thoroughly ashamed of what humans are doing in it's name.

On 10 May 2008 at 21:23, Christopher England wrote:

Quoting a previous Alex Jenkins contribution:-

the ship is here

the vessel has been berthed at Portland for over a month. filming commenced over a week ago. Visitors to the ship have included Johnny Walker.

Alex Jenkins <...> said:

 

From: Steve Leyland [...]
Sent: 11 May 2008 10:39
To: ...
Subject: Re: [Anorak Nation] Lies that change radio history

 

And only this week we in the UK are rewriting a most horrific part of history just because it offends the MUSLIM believers  

www.celticmusicradio.net
 

Yes, sad how we seem to be too quick in this country to change things for 'others'. Who ever thought that the mass killing of millions during WWII by the Nazis never happened has definately got a sick demented mind in my opinion. I'd rather keep my views on islam / muslims to my self on this forum as some think my language towards certain references is OTT, so be it. Some may call my opinions 'racist', this shows how ignorant some are, islam is not a race.

So, bearing all that in mind and more,Islam = Mental Disease and that's me putting it politely. Just read some of the Sharia Laws as a fine example of islamic humanity. Anyone who condones Sharia beliefs must have a sick mind. It ain't normal. Fiddling with 9 year old girls isn't normal let alone marrying them. Back to the subject of Jews and Russians being massacred, Islamic beliefs here are in denial as it is a well known fact the German Military consulted with Muslims in the middle east to learn methods of Torture throughout WWII to be used on POWs & at Concentration Camps.

I don't blame the muslims for wanting to change history here in the UK education system, I blame the white do gooder, liberal lefty who assists muslims with this disgusting form of brainwashing. These are the people who need to be brought to trial as traitors and beheaded in the way the very religion they are assisting deals with things under Sharia Law.

'Another rant by'

The Guff

We search for the best rock station

From: "Alan Milewczyk" <...>

The problem, as you rightly say is, when something goes down in print,
whether it's true or not, that it's just a matter of time before someone
accepts it as gospel.

And to open a new can of worms. The bible is the biggest example of this.

Loads of different authors, what is to say none of them took a bit of liberty with the facts.

Christopher England wrote:
: We search for the best rock station

I vote for Merseyland Alternative Radio.
:
:
: Poll: My favourite rock radio station is quite definitely
: * The Arrow
: * Caroline (Maidstone)
: * Kerrang Radio
: * Planet Caroline
: * Planet Rock
: * Rock Radio
: * Radio Seagull
: * Totalrock
: * Virgin Classic Rock
: * XFM
: Poll closes at 08 June 2008 12:11.
: View poll results at
: http://www.anoraknation.com/discussion/polls/2230409.
:
: Free thought + Free speech + Free radio = Anorak Nation
: --- This message is from Anorak Nation
: (http://www.anoraknation.com/)
:

To unsubscribe, send a mail to

: ...?subject=unsubscribe
: www.jigluhood.com – communities that think for themselves
:
: ______ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
: signature database 3090 (20080509) ______
:
: The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
:
: http://www.eset.com

Absolutely numbing, those images of what humankind can do to his own species in the name of what, NATIONLISM. They go on about carbon footprints, and yet 10s of thousands of people in Burma are dying, because their government is ran by the military. The world is a beautiful planet, ruined by it's present master species, the human race. We are all as easy led by the ruling classes, the holocaust happened a mere 70 years ago, and theyre wiping it from the books of todays students, absolutely totally insane. I have nothing against people believing in what they want to believe, but i don't need their religion i've got my own belief, in my own head, i don't need to convince anyone else i'm right, it's personal choice. All this religious dogma, all these "nutters", brainwashed by whoever, in the short time mankind has been on this planet, he's done nowt but fight, kill, massacre, all for the sake of what, two things, Power and Greed. To throw a little radio into this very serious matter, Lord Haw Haw, (William Joyce) was hanged for treason, for working for the German Radio, ok he was giving out their "propaganda", but not much else, there wasn't much justice for him neither.

Alex

Those images are still shocking 60+ years on.

I take your point about removing it from our schools. That is shocking if true.

Surely they are missing the bigger picture about the holocaust. It wasn't just committed against Jews, they also killed Slavs, communists, disabled, mentally ill, gypsies, homosexuals to name a few, plus all the war crimes that were committed in the occupied countries. It was a crime against humanity not just the Jewish people.
This is a story that should be told, as a lesson to future generations.

Quoting a previous Steve Leyland contribution:-

I've read the Bible, The Quran, and many other religious books.
Perhaps I'm wrong but I never spotted any "Kill the unbeliever" text in
any of them.

Sadly, I think you are wrong. The Torah, Bible and Quran all contain either direct instructions or parabled references to how to kill the unbeliever let alone the fact that they should be killed. Only the works describing Jesus don't portray him as being into killing. Subsequent bits added in to Bible after the Jesus stories go on about killing. It's these that were used by the Catholic church to justify their culling of women as witches, or to participate in crusades. Meanwhile the Quran's writer Mohammed goes into great detail about how to kill unbelievers, hence the structured 'beheadings' of 'Westerners' we've famously seen.

—
* Christopher England just said that *



I'm not going to get on my soap box, but i might as well, it is free speech on here. The concentration camps in germany were there long before the war, they murdered hundreds of thousands of their so called"inferior" peoples, including, people with mental illnesses, or who just didn't fit the bill of a pure german. The Brits in their infinite wisdom had camps in the mid thirties too, full of so called "mentally or physically handicapped or just disabled people" so as to "purify" the british stock. They were covered up off course, with the start of the 2nd world war, they were phased out. Mr Oswald Moseley and his manic black shirts, were the british version of our Nazis Party in the 30s too. It was turbulent times way back then, I'm glad i didn't have to live thru those dark and dangerous years.Fot the sake of generations to come this recent history of genecide should not be forgotten, ever. It seems that even things like the holocaust, is insignificant, i don't think so. I know in the history of man, there has been many millions killed/murderd because of whatever, but we have PROOF, real proof of what the Nazis did in the 30s and 40s, it should be remembered at least once a year, to remind folk now of how horrific mankind can be, maybe it might make people think twice, before casting their votes for a new regime.



Quoting a previous Alex Jenkins contribution:-

And only this week we in the UK are rewriting a most horrific part of
history just because it offends the MUSLIM believers

This is just part of the much bigger Islamification of Britain.

This week, the UK removed The Holocaust from its school curriculum
because it 'offended' the Muslim population which claims it never
occurred.

The thing is, we really really don't know, and we can't know what actually happened. We are reliant on the 'historians' (or 'chroniclers') to tell us the details. Depending on which 'historian' is writing or speaking the story will change.

We've seen how stories can change on a subject such as the history of radio which we collectively know a lot about. We know that they are changed by people with agendas to make themselves look bigger and better, or changed (maybe 'innocently') to make the story read a lot 'sexier' than the actual truth. So, on something far more important such as the Holocaust there are plenty of folk, including whole States, with agendas as to which story we should believe.

I'm not a Holocaust denier, but I certainly do question the accuracy of the 'details' I'm fed about it. When you look at counter 'evidence' provided by people like David Irving it can be extremely compelling to at least stop and say, "Hang on a minute", especially when he's demonstrating in pictures the truth of what a picture actually shows, yet is being claimed by other interested parties to show something else. There's even demonstrations of how things have been drawn on to photos in order to show things that were never there on the originals, but are photos being touted to support mass murder claims.

So, at the very least a free-thinker has to stop and question the Holocaust, not just accept blindly what we are told about it. It certainly wasn't an exclusively Jewish tragedy either. If any evidence is being distorted it's quite definitely in the under-representation of the figures of non-Jews who were brutalised. That, at the very least, needs to be addressed.

Re; the chain email:

Take a look at the photos though. What do they really represent? Let's be completely brutal about this: A building that appears to have suffered extensive bomb or fire damage. A fence that appears to have moved (possibly as a result of a bomb blast?), and a hundred or so dead people.

Where's the proof these people were executed, are Jews, or are the victims of any form of systematic genocide? By looking at these photos, horrendous as they are, I'm afraid I see no evidence one way or the other. Yet people will 'suggest' they are evidence of 'x' or of 'y'. They may well be. But, all I've got is the word of whoever is presenting the pictures to me. And they'll always have an agenda.

—
* Christopher England just said that *